Popular Articles

Shortage Of Family Physicians Troubles States, ERs
"This spring, 385 students graduated from Georgia"s medical schools, but only two of them chose to remain in the state to pursue a family medicine residency," the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports. "Overall, 20 students, or 5 percent, chose to go into family medicine - half the number that it was just five years ago." More than one-third of counties in Georgia, "many of them rural, are officially designated as primary-care health professional shortage areas," meaning there is "less than 1 doctor for 3,500 people." According to a recent study from the University of Missouri School of Medicine, "there could be a nationwide shortage of around 44,000 primary-care doctors by the year 2025, due to an aging population and fewer doctors training in primary care."

MUHC Researcher Awarded $500,000 To Study Pathogenesis Of Infectious Disease
The Burroughs Wellcome Fund (BWF) has announced the recipients of the 2009 Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award. MUHC researcher Dr. Maya Saleh was one of six recipients granted $500,000 over a 6-year period for her research proposal, "Regulation and molecular mechanisms of NLR-mediated innate immunity."
News of the day
Welsh Assembly Government Written Statement On Swine Influenza, Wlales
This statement updates Members on the Influenza A (H1N1v) swine flu outbreak and the latest developments in Wales and across the UK.
Cardiovascular

Personal Exposure Monitors Show Pharmacy Workers Inhale Drugs When Using Air Pressure-Activated Dispensing Machines

AlburtyLab released a report on its comprehensive evaluation of health risks for workers in pharmacies using air pressure-activated drug dispensing machines. The study tested pharmacy workers wearing personal exposure monitors (PEMs) while using the two leading types of air pressure-activated dispensing technologies - the McKesson/Parata Max and the McKesson/Parata RDS. This is the third major study conducted by AlburtyLab examining the issues relating to pharmacy worker exposure. The study found that workers were exposed to particles in the size range subject to the most health concerns - 2.5 microns or smaller (characterized by EPA as PM-2.5), and that the particles contained active pharmaceutical agents. It finds that a wide range of pharmaceuticals are inhaled and reports the concentrations observed, again raising serious health concerns. "What"s most concerning is that these particle sizes are known to penetrate the lungs deeply and rapidly enter the bloodstream," said David Alburty, President of AlburtyLab and lead researcher. "We don"t know what the effects will be of inhaling the pharmaceuticals every workday over years of employment." In accordance with best research practices, the AlburtyLab study utilized PEMs, which are small, self-contained sampling systems worn in the breathing zone of staff while working. The PEMs collected samples of airborne particles for analysis. According to Alburty, "This is the third study we have done on this subject. The first two studies focused on air sampling and showed that airborne drug particles were being generated by these machines in significant concentrations. This latest study focused on what is actually being inhaled by a worker in the course of a day on the job. As an aerosol scientist-researcher, I became concerned about exposure for pharmacy workers to the pill dust that is very visible around these machines. Air pressure-activated dispensing causes a great deal of agitation to the pills, and pills are not engineered to absorb the impact. The studies prove that agitation of the pills by pressurized air causes pharmaceutical compounds to be released into the air, creating PM-2.5 pill dust which is then inhaled by pharmacy workers." The AlburtyLab studies are the first to unveil risks to workers and customers in pharmacies arising from pill dust. Previous extensive air quality studies have been performed with respect to personnel safety in coal mines, cotton mills, etc., and those studies have been useful in the development of workplace standards. Alburty recommends that further studies be conducted by federal regulatory agencies to assess human health risks, set guidelines for these types of machines, and establish procedures to monitor the health impact on pharmacy workers. The report also suggests that a federal review determine if it is necessary to conduct a human health risk assessment in pharmacies using PEMs on pharmacy workers (as were employed during this phase of testing) and conducting ongoing health and/or blood and urinalysis monitoring of exposed workers. AlburtyLab, Inc.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):